We Were Liars Deluxe Edition
By:E. Lockhart
Published on 2017-05-23 by Delacorte Press
The New York Times bestseller We Were Liars is now available as a not-to-be-missed hardcover deluxe edition! Whether you know how it ends (shh . . . don’t tell!) or have let too many seasons go by without discovering the truth about the Liars for yourself, you will want to get your hands on the exclusive new content in this deluxe edition. And act fast: the first printing is signed by the author! A beautiful and distinguished family. A private island. A brilliant, damaged girl; a passionate, political boy. A group of four friends—the Liars—whose friendship turns destructive. A revolution. An accident. A secret. Lies upon lies. True love. The truth. We Were Liars is a modern, sophisticated suspense novel from National Book Award finalist and Printz Award honoree E. Lockhart. In addition to the bestselling novel, the collector’s edition includes: · Never-before-shared letters from Gat to Cadence · A fascinating behind-the-scenes look at the author’s creative process · The author’s hand-drawn map of Beechwood Island and the Sinclair family tree · Unique ideas for book discussions—Sinclair family–style · An excerpt from E. Lockhart’s upcoming novel Genuine Fraud—a psychological thriller that will leave you breathless Read it. And if anyone asks you how it ends, just LIE. Praise for We Were Liars: 20 Weeks on the New York Times Bestseller List “Haunting, sophisticated . . . a novel so twisty and well-told that it will appeal to older readers as well as to adolescents.” —The Wall Street Journal “A rich, stunning summer mystery with a sharp twist that will leave you dying to talk about the book with a pal or ten.” —Parade.com “Thrilling, beautiful, and blisteringly smart, We Were Liars is utterly unforgettable.” —John Green, #1 New York Times bestselling author of The Fault in Our Stars “You’re going to want to remember the title. Liars details the summers of a girl who harbors a dark secret, and delivers a satisfying, but shocking twist ending.” —Entertainment Weekly “An ambitious novel with an engaging voice, a clever plot and some terrific writing.” —The New York Times Book Review “No one should be talking about the shocking twist ending. What we can talk about is . . . [Lockhart’s] razor-sharp portrayal of a family for whom keeping up appearances is paramount and, ultimately, tragic.” —Chicago Tribune
This Book was ranked at 23 by Google Books for keyword Teen.
Book ID of We Were Liars Deluxe Edition's Books is WKHnDQAAQBAJ, Book which was written byE. Lockharthave ETAG "9N86N4obNfE"
Book which was published by Delacorte Press since 2017-05-23 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9781524766955 and ISBN 10 Code is 152476695X
Reading Mode in Text Status is true and Reading Mode in Image Status is false
Book which have "272 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryYoung Adult Fiction
This Book was rated by 2 Raters and have average rate at "4.5"
This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE
Book was written in en
eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is falseand in ePub is true
Book Preview
Do not you sort of loathe how we've joined the decadent phase of Goodreads where possibly fifty per cent (or more) of the reviews published by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually naked and unabashed inside their variously powerful efforts at being posture, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Do not you kind of maple (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's merry druthers) for the good ol'times of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all evaluations were consistently plainspoke Don't you type of hate how we've joined the decadent period of Goodreads wherein possibly fifty percent (or more) of the opinions compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now naked and unabashed inside their variously successful efforts at being posture, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Do not you type of pine (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's happy druthers) for the great ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all evaluations were consistently plainspoken, merely utilitarian, unpretentious, and -- above all otherwise -- dull, boring, boring? Don't you type of loathe when people say'do not you believe this way or feel this way'in an attempt to goad you equally psychologically and grammatically in to accepting together? In what of ABBA: I actually do, I really do, I do(, I do, I do). Well, as the interwebs is just a world in which yesteryear stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the current (and with fetish porn), we are able to review yesteryear in their inviolable presentness anytime we wish. Or at least until this amazing site ultimately tanks. Consider (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's overview of Macbeth in their entirety. I've destined it with a heavy string and pulled it here for your perusal. (Please recognize that many a sic are implied in these reviews.) their actually difficult and ridiculous! why cant we be examining like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at the very least that guide is excellent! There you've it. Refreshingly, not really a evaluation prepared in among the witch's sounds or alluding to Hillary and Bill Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Merely a primal scream unleashed into the black wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) a teen, but I admire his capability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation by having an economy and an understanding that renders his convictions all the more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's review of the exact same play. You might'know'MICHAEL; he's the'Problems Architect'here at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in that it implies that he designs problems... that will be the case, for several I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that that you don't want to learn is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks to start with, if it was meant to be read, then it will be a novel, not a play. Along with that the teach had us students browse the play aloud (on person for every character for a couple pages). None people had browse the play before. None of us wanted to read it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that appeared as if they weren't paying attention. All this compounded to produce me virtually hate reading classics for something such as 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. And yes it can really fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between the author and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to learn plays is wrong, and in the event that you require anyone, under duress, to learn a play you then have sinned and are likely to hell, in the event that you rely on hell. If not, you're planning to the DMV. I am also fed up with whatever you smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists along with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of a note overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age when we are taught to respect each other's differences, this indicates offensively egocentric and mean-spirited to anticipate others tokowtow for a petty linguistic rules. Inspired concept will certainly absolutely free themselves however you are attempting in order to shackle it. That may be ones sign, Aubrey. With this impression, your have fun with Macbeth had been this worste peice possibly provided by Shakespeare, which is saying quite a lot contemplating in addition, i go through his / her Romeo in addition to Juliet. Ontop regarding it really is currently fabulous storyline, impracticable character types along with absolutly discusting set of ethics, Shakespeare candidly molds Lovely lady Macbeth because the correct vilian while in the play. Thinking of nancy mearly your words within the rear game and Macbeth herself is truely choosing the hideous violations, like hard in addition to fraudulence, I do not realise why it's so effortless to assume this Macbeth would probably be ready to do very good as an alternative to unpleasant only if his partner have been far more possitive. In my opinion this participate in is uterally unrealistic. Nonetheless this is the ne in addition super regarding vintage e book reviewing. Though succinct and also without annoying inclination to be able to coyness or maybe cuteness, Jo's examine alludes to some anger therefore outstanding it's inexpressible. Just one imagines a number of Signet Timeless Designs compromised so that you can bits together with pruning shears around Jo's vicinity. I don't really like this play. A case in point that I am unable to sometimes present you with just about any analogies or perhaps similes as to how much My partner and i despise it. A incrementally snarkier style will often have explained a thing like...'I hate this kind of have fun with as being a simile I cannot surface with.' Not really Jo. Your woman articulates some sort of raw, undecorated truth of the matter unfit intended for figurative language. Plus there is no problem by using that. The moment throughout an excellent even though, when you are getting neck-deep inside dandified pomo hijinks, it's a pleasant wallow while in the hog put in writing you will be itchin'for. Thanks a lot, Jo. I like you and the ineffective gripping in similes which won't be able to strategy a bilious hate with your heart. You might be acquire, as well as My business is yours. Figuratively conversing, with course. And today this is the review: Macbeth through Bill Shakespeare is the best literary do the job while in the British dialect, along with anybody who disagrees can be an asshole including a dumbhead.
Comments
Post a Comment