What I Lost Become

What I Lost
By:Alexandra Ballard
Published on 2017-06-06 by Farrar, Straus and Giroux (BYR)

What sixteen-year-old Elizabeth has lost so far: forty pounds, four jean sizes, a boyfriend, and her peace of mind. As a result, she’s finally a size zero. She’s also the newest resident at Wallingfield, a treatment center for girls like her—girls with eating disorders. Elizabeth is determined to endure the program so she can go back home, where she plans to start restricting her food intake again.She’s pretty sure her mom, who has her own size-zero obsession, needs treatment as much as she does. Maybe even more. Then Elizabeth begins receiving mysterious packages. Are they from her ex-boyfriend, a secret admirer, or someone playing a cruel trick? This eloquent debut novel rings with authenticity as it follows Elizabeth’s journey to taking an active role in her recovery, hoping to get back all that she lost.

This Book was ranked at 39 by Google Books for keyword Teen.

Book ID of What I Lost's Books is L918DQAAQBAJ, Book which was written byAlexandra Ballardhave ETAG "QGRw/D4JkLM"

Book which was published by Farrar, Straus and Giroux (BYR) since 2017-06-06 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9780374304645 and ISBN 10 Code is 0374304645

Reading Mode in Text Status is true and Reading Mode in Image Status is false

Book which have "288 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryYoung Adult Fiction

This Book was rated by Raters and have average rate at ""

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is falseand in ePub is true

Book Preview

Don't you sort of hate how we have entered the decadent period of Goodreads when perhaps fifty per cent (or more) of the opinions compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now naked and unabashed in their variously effective attempts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you sort of pine (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's merry druthers) for the nice ol'times of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all opinions were uniformly plainspoke Do not you type of loathe how we've joined the decadent period of Goodreads wherein perhaps fifty % (or more) of the opinions published by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now naked and unabashed within their variously efficient attempts at being posture, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you kind of wood (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's merry druthers) for the good ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all evaluations were uniformly plainspoken, only practical, unpretentious, and -- most importantly else -- boring, dull, dull? Don't you type of loathe when persons claim'don't you think in this manner or feel that way'in an endeavor to goad you equally psychologically and grammatically into agreeing together? In the words of ABBA: I do, I really do, I do(, I really do, I do). Well, since the interwebs is just a world where yesteryear stands shoulder-to-shoulder with today's (and with fetish porn), we can revisit days gone by in their inviolable presentness any moment we wish. Or at the very least till this amazing site finally tanks. Consider (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's review of Macbeth in their entirety. I've bound it with a heavy rope and dragged it here for your perusal. (Please realize that several a sic are recommended in the following reviews.) their actually difficult and foolish! why cant we be studying like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at the least that book is great! There you've it. Refreshingly, not really a evaluation prepared in among the witch's sounds or alluding to Hillary and Statement Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Just a primal shout unleashed in to the dark wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) a teenager, but I admire his capability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation with an economy and a clarity that renders his convictions all the more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's report on the same play. You might'know'MICHAEL; he is the'Problems Architect'here at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in that it implies that he designs problems... which might be the case, for all I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that you do not want to see is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks to start with, if it had been supposed to be read, then it will be a novel, not really a play. Together with that the teach had us students see the play aloud (on person for each character for a couple pages). None people had read the play before. None of us wanted to see it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that appeared to be they weren't paying attention. All of this compounded to make me pretty much hate reading classics for something similar to 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. And yes it can really fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between the writer and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to read plays is wrong, and if you require anyone, under duress, to read a play then you definitely have sinned and will hell, if you rely on hell. If not, you're going to the DMV. I'm also tired of whatever you smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of an email overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age whenever we are taught to respect each other's differences, it appears offensively egocentric and mean-spirited you may anticipate others tokowtow to the small linguistic rules. Inspired term will certainly totally free on its own however you attempt to help shackle it. That is your signal, Aubrey. Around my very own opinion, the enjoy Macbeth was this worste peice ever before authored by Shakespeare, this also says quite a lot contemplating furthermore, i examine her Romeo plus Juliet. Ontop of it can be presently amazing plan, improbable character types as well as absolutly discusting range of ethics, Shakespeare honestly molds Lady Macbeth for the reason that legitimate vilian within the play. Taking into consideration she's mearly the actual tone of voice around a corner spherical and Macbeth herself is definitely truely carrying out this monsterous offenses, such as killing in addition to fraud, I really don't realise why it's very quick to imagine in which Macbeth might be inclined to perform excellent as an alternative to wicked but only if their partner ended up much more possitive. In my opinion that your perform will be uterally unrealistic. Nevertheless the subsequent is undoubtedly the actual ne plus extra regarding typical e-book reviewing. While succinct and also without the distracting inclination so that you can coyness as well as cuteness, Jo's evaluate alludes to your animosity consequently unique that it is inexpressible. 1 imagines a handful of Signet Typical Versions compromised to help sections together with pruning shears in Jo's vicinity. I detest this play. A case in point that I am unable to actually give you just about any analogies and also similes in respect of just how much I dislike it. A good incrementally snarkier style could have explained one thing like...'I hate this have fun with just like a simile I am unable to arise with.' Never Jo. The lady echoes any uncooked, undecorated simple fact unhealthy for figurative language. And there's certainly no problem using that. As soon as inside an awesome when, when you're getting neck-deep throughout dandified pomo hijinks, it can be a good wallow inside the hog pencil that you are itchin'for. Thanks a lot, Jo. I love you and your useless gripping during similes which cannot approach the actual bilious hate in your heart. That you are acquire, in addition to We're yours. Figuratively chatting, connected with course. And now here i will discuss our evaluation: Macbeth through Bill Shakespeare is the best fictional operate inside the English vocabulary, in addition to anyone who disagrees is an asshole plus a dumbhead.