Get It Together, Delilah! Browse

Get It Together, Delilah!
By:Erin Gough
Published on 2017-04-04 by Chronicle Books


Seventeen-year-old Delilah Green wouldn't have chosen to do her last year of school this way, but she figures it's working fine. While her dad goes on a trip to fix his broken heart after her mom left him for another man, Del manages the family cafe. Easy, she thinks. But what about homework? Or the nasty posse of mean girls making her life hell? Or her best friend who won't stop guilt-tripping her? Or her other best friend who might go to jail for love if Del doesn't do something? But really, who cares about any of that when all Del can think about is beautiful Rosa who dances every night across the street. . . . Until one day Rosa comes in the cafe door. And if Rosa starts thinking about Del, too, then how in the name of caramel milkshakes will Del get the rest of it together?

This Book was ranked at 38 by Google Books for keyword Teen.

Book ID of Get It Together, Delilah!'s Books is 8SXeDQAAQBAJ, Book which was written byErin Goughhave ETAG "FFhAzeXLcRo"

Book which was published by Chronicle Books since 2017-04-04 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9781452152271 and ISBN 10 Code is 1452152276

Reading Mode in Text Status is true and Reading Mode in Image Status is true

Book which have "336 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryYoung Adult Fiction

This Book was rated by 12 Raters and have average rate at "3.5"

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is true and in ePub is true

Book Preview



Do not you kind of loathe how we have joined the decadent stage of Goodreads wherein perhaps fifty % (or more) of the opinions compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now bare and unabashed inside their variously effective efforts at being arc, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Do not you kind of pine (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's merry druthers) for the good ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all reviews were consistently plainspoke Do not you kind of hate how we've entered the decadent stage of Goodreads where perhaps fifty per cent (or more) of the opinions compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now actually nude and unabashed in their variously powerful attempts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you sort of maple (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's merry druthers) for the great ol'times of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all evaluations were evenly plainspoken, merely practical, unpretentious, and -- especially else -- boring, boring, boring? Don't you type of loathe when persons say'do not you believe in this manner or sense that way'in an effort to goad you both psychologically and grammatically in to agreeing using them? In the words of ABBA: I actually do, I actually do, I do(, I do, I do). Properly, because the interwebs is a world in which yesteryear stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the current (and with fetish porn), we could review the past in their inviolable presentness anytime we wish. Or at the very least until this website finally tanks. Contemplate (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's overview of Macbeth in their entirety. I've bound it with huge rope and drawn it here for your perusal. (Please recognize that many a sic are recommended in the following reviews.) its actually complex and ridiculous! why cant we be studying like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at least that book is great! There you've it. Refreshingly, not really a review written in one of the witch's comments or alluding to Hillary and Statement Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Only a primal yell unleashed into the black wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) an adolescent, but I admire his ability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation having an economy and a clarity that renders his convictions all the more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's review of exactly the same play. You might'know'MICHAEL; he is the'Problems Architect'here at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in that it implies that he designs problems... which might be the case, for many I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that you never want to read is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks to start with, if it had been meant to be read, then it would be a novel, not really a play. Together with that the teach had us students see the play aloud (on person for every character for a couple pages). None folks had browse the play before. None people wanted to see it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that looked like they weren't paying attention. All of this compounded to make me more or less hate reading classics for something like 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. Plus it can really fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between the writer and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to see plays is wrong, and if you require anyone, under duress, to learn a play then you definitely have sinned and are going to hell, in the event that you believe in hell. If not, you're likely to the DMV. I'm also fed up with all you could smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists together with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of a message overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age when we are taught to respect each other's differences, this indicates offensively egocentric and mean-spirited to expect others tokowtow on your small linguistic rules. Inspired appearance will certainly free of charge themselves however you might try to help shackle it. That is certainly your current signal, Aubrey. In this viewpoint, the participate in Macbeth was the worste peice ever published by Shakespeare, which says quite a lot looking at furthermore, i read his Romeo plus Juliet. Ontop regarding it's presently fantastic piece, unlikely character types and also absolutly discusting range of ethics, Shakespeare publicly portrays Female Macbeth because the real vilian in the play. Contemplating nancy mearly the style with the back around as well as Macbeth herself is truely carrying out your hideous criminal activity, which includes kill along with fraudulence, I really don't see why it is so easy to imagine this Macbeth would probably be prepared to undertake excellent instead of nasty but only if her girl were additional possitive. I do think this play will be uterally unrealistic. However this is the actual ne in addition ultra regarding basic publication reviewing. Although succinct and also without any distracting trend to coyness and also cuteness, Jo's evaluation alludes to the anger hence unique that must be inexpressible. A person imagines a couple of Signet Vintage Designs hacked so that you can bits using pruning shears inside Jo's vicinity. I personally don't like this play. So much in fact that will I am unable to perhaps provide you with just about any analogies and also similes about just how much My spouse and i despise it. A great incrementally snarkier style might have mentioned one thing like...'I hate this enjoy such as a simile I won't occur with.' Never Jo. She talks any organic, undecorated simple fact not fit pertaining to figurative language. And also there is nothing wrong by using that. One time around a fantastic although, once you get neck-deep around dandified pomo hijinks, it is a fantastic wallow inside the hog compose you're itchin'for. Thank you so much, Jo. I enjoy both you and your futile clasping on similes this are not able to technique your bilious hate in your heart. You might be acquire, plus I will be yours. Figuratively conversing, connected with course. And today and here is the review: Macbeth by simply Bill Shakespeare is a good fictional perform inside English words, along with anyone who disagrees can be an asshole and a dumbhead.

Comments